Книга: Коммуникационный менеджмент власти. Институциональные теории и дискурсивные практики. Учебное пособие
Список использованной литературы
Список использованной литературы
1. Бодрунова С.С. Современные стратегии британской политической коммуникации. М., 2010.
2. Бурдье П. Клиническая социология поля науки // Социоанализ Пьера Бурдье. Альманах Российско-французского центра социологии и философии Института социологии Российской Академии наук / отв. ред. H.A. Шматко. М., 2001.
3. Бурдье П. О телевидении и журналистике. М., 2002.
4. Вежбицкая А. Сравнение – градация – метафора // Теория метафоры / ред. Н.Д. Арутюнова. М., 1990. C. 133–154.
5. Гудков Д.Б. Прецедентные феномены в текстах политического дискурса // Язык СМИ как объект междисциплинарного исследования / отв. ред. М.Н. Володина. М., 2003.
6. Дай Т., Зиглер Л. Демократия для элиты. Введение в американскую политику. М., 1984.
7. Зенгер Х. Стратагемы. О китайском искусстве жить и выживать: в 2 т. М., 2004.
8. Луман Н. Власть. М., 2001.
9. Луман Н. Реальность массмедиа. М., 2005.
10. Муфф Ш. К агонистической модели демократии // Логос. 2004. № 2 (42). P. 180–197.
11. Ноэль-Нойман Э. Общественное мнение. Открытие спирали молчания. М., 1996.
12. Ортега-и-Гассет Х. Восстание масс. М., 2003.
13. Русакова О.Ф., Русаков В.М. PR-дискурс: теоретико-методологический анализ. Екатеринбург, 2008.
14. Улановский А.М. Теория речевых актов и социальный конструкционизм // Постнеклассическая психология. Социальный конструкционизм и нарративный подход. 2004. № 1.
15. Хабермас Ю. Теория коммуникативного действия // Вестник Московского университета. Философия. 1993. № 4. C. 43–63.
16. Шумпетер Й.А. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.
17. Яноу Д., ван Хульст М. Фреймы политического: от фрейм-анализа к анализу фреймирования // Социологическое обозрение. 2011. Т 10. № 1–2. С. 87—113.
18. Altheide D.L. Media logic and political communication // Political Communication. 2004. Vol. 21 (3). P. 293–296.
19. Altheide D.L., Snow R.P. Media logic. London: Sage Publications, 1979.
20. Amsterdam A.G., Bruner J.S. Minding the law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.
21. Appel M., Richter T. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion. A mediated moderation model // Media Psychology. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 101–135.
22. Arnold W.E., McCroskey J.C. The credibility of reluctant testimony // The Central States Speech Journal. 1967. Vol. 18. P. 97—103.
23. Arrow K. Social choice and individual values. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.
24. Baker S., Martinson D.L. The TARES test: Five principles for ethical persuasion // Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 2001. Vol. 16 (2–3). P. 148–175.
25. Baum M.A. Circling the wagons: Soft news and isolationism in American public opinion // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48 (2). P. 313–338.
26. Baum M.A. Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public // American Journal of Political Science. 2002. № 96. P. 91—109.
27. Baum M.A., Jamison A.S. The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently // The Journal of Politics. 2006. Vol. 68 (4). P. 946–959.
28. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: An Overview and assessment // Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. № 26. P. 611–639.
29. Bennett W.L. Beyond pseudoevents: Election news as reality TV // American Behavioral Scientist. 2005. Vol. 49 (3). P. 364–378.
30. Bennett W.L. News: The Politics of illusion. N.Y.: Longman, 1984.
31. Bennett W.L. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States // Journal of Communication. 1990. Vol. 40 (2). Р. 103–125.
32. Bennett W.L., Lawrence R., Livingston S. When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.
33. Bentele G., Liebert T., Seeling S. Von der Determination zur Intereffikation: Ein integriertes Modell zum Verhaltnis von Public Relations und Journalimus // Aktuelle Entstehung von Offentlichkeit. Akteure, Strukturen, Veranderungen / eds. G. Bentele, M. Haller. Konstanz: UVK, 1997. S. 225–250.
34. Bessette J.M. Deliberative democracy: The Majority principle in republican government // How democratic is the constitution? // eds. R.A. Goldwin, W.A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980. P. 102–116.
35. Bird S.E. The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. N.Y.: Routledge, 2003.
36. Birkland T. A. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting // Journal of Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 18 (1). P. 53–74.
37. Bitzer L.F. The rhetorical situation // Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1968. № 1. P. 1—14.
38. Black М. Metaphor // Black M. Models and metaphor. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962. P. 25–47.
39. Blader S.L., Tyler T.R. A Four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a «fair» process // personality and social psychology bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29 (6). P.747–758.
40. Blumer H. Social problems as collective behavior // Social Problems. 1971. № 18. P. 298–306.
41. Blumler J.G., Kavanagh D. The Third Age of political communication: Influences and features // Political Communication. 1999. № 16. P. 209–230.
42. Boorstin D.J. The image: Or what happened to the American dream. N.Y.: Atheneum, 1962/1977.
43. Boswell J. Policy narratives in a deliberative system // Australian Political Science Association Conference, September 26–28, 2010, University of Melbourne.
44. Bovens M. Public accountability // The Oxford Handbook of Public Management / eds. E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 182–208.
45. B?low-M?ller A.V Corporate apologia and the attribution of guilt // Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in present-day society / eds. L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, J. Strunck. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. P. 340–358.
46. Calhoun C. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere // Habermas and the public sphere / ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. P. 1—50.
47. Campbell M.C., Docherty J.S. What’s in a frame? (that which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet) // Marquette Law Review. 2004. Vol. 87 (4). P. 769–781.
48. Caplan B. The logic of collective belief // Independent Institute. Working Paper № 4. October 1999. URL: http://www.independent.org/pdf/working_papers/04_logic.pdf
49. Cappella J.N., Price V, Nir L. Argument repertoire as a reliable and valid measure of opinion quality: Electronic dialogue during campaign 2000 // Political Communication. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 73–93.
50. Chaiken S., Liberman A., Eagly A.H. Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context // Unintended thought / eds. J.S. Uleman, J.A. Bargh. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1989. P. 212–252.
51. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. Participation in American politics: The Dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972/1983.
52. Cobb R.W., Elder C.D. The politics of agenda-building: An Alternative perspective for modern democratic theory // The Journal of Politics. 1971. № 33 (4). P. 892–915.
53. Coman M. Media anthropology: An Overview // Paper for European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) Media Anthropology Network e-seminar May 17, 2005.
54. Cook T.E. Governing with the news: The News media as a political institution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.
55. Coombs W.T. The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis // Journal of Promotion Management. 2006. Vol. 12 (3). P. 241–260.
56. Craig G. Living with spin. Political and media relations in mediated public life // Southern Review. 2003. Vol. 36 (3). P. 82–91.
57. Crouse T Boys on the bus: Riding with the campaign press corps. N.Y.: Random House, 1973.
58. Cuthbertson G.M. Political myth and epic. Michigan: Michigan State University Press, 1975.
59. Dascal M. Two pronged dialectic / ed. M. Dascal. Leibniz: What kind of rationalist? // Dordrecht: Springer, 2009. P. 37–72.
60. Davies N. Flat Earth News: An аward-winning reporter exposes falsehood, distortion and propaganda in the Global Media. London: Chatto and Windus, 2008.
61. Davis A. Public relations democracy: Public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
62. Dayan D., Katz E. Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.
63. de Vreese C.H., Elenbaas M. Media in the game of politics: Effects of strategic metacoverage on political cynicism // The International Journal of Press/Politics. 2008. Vol. 13 (3). Р. 285–309.
64. DiMaggio P.J. Interest and agency in institutional theory // Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment / ed. L.G. Zucker. Cambridge: Ballinger, 1988. P. 3—21.
65. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The Iron Cage Revisted: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. P. 147–160.
66. Dolezel L. Narrative worlds // Sound, sign and meaning. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1979.
67. Donohue G.A., Tichenor P.J., Olien C.N. A guard dog perspective on the role of media // Journal of Communication. 1995. Vol. 45 (2). P. 115–132.
68. Downs A. An economic theory of political action in a democracy // The Journal of Political Economy. 1957. Vol. 65 (2). P. 135–150.
69. Downs A. Up and down with ecology – The «issue-attention cycle» // Public Interest. 1972. № 28. Р. 38–50.
70. Dryzek J.S. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
71. Dryzek J.S. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
72. Dryzek J.S. Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy // Political Theory. 2001. Vol. 29 (5). P. 651–669.
73. Dryzek J.S., Niemeyer S. Discursive representation // American Political Science Review. 2008. № 102. P. 481–493.
74. Dutton J.E., Ashford S.J. Selling issues to top management // Academy of Management Review. 1993. Vol. 18. P. 397–428.
75. Edelman M.J. Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. N.Y: Academic Press, 1977.
76. Ellwood J.W., Patashnik E.M. In praise of pork // Public Interest. 1993. № 110. P. 19–33.
77. Elsbach K.D., Sutton R.I. Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories // Academy of Management Journal. 1992. Vol. 35 (4). P. 699–738.
78. Elster J. Deliberation and constitution making // Deliberative democracy / ed. J. Elster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. P. 97—122.
79. Entman R.M. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm // Journal of Communication. 1993. Vol. 43 (4). Р. 51–58.
80. Entman R.M. Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
81. Esser F., D’Angelo P. Framing the press and the publicity process // The American Behavioral Scientist. 2003. Vol. 46 (5). P. 617–641.
82. Fauconnier G., Turner M. Conceptual projection and middle spaces // April 1994. Report 9401. Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0515.
83. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. N.Y.: Basic Books, 2002.
84. Fischer F., Gottweis H. Introduction // The argumentative turn revisited. Public policy as communicative practice / eds. F. Fischer, H. Gottweis. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012. P. 1—27.
85. Fishman M. Manufacturing the news. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980.
86. Foote J.S. Coorientation in the network television newsprocessing system: Coverage of the United States house of representatives // Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Acapulco, Mexico. 18–23 May 1980.
87. Fredriksson M., Pallas J., Wehmeier S. Public relations and neo-institutional theory // Public Relations Inquiry. 2013. Vol. 2 (3). P. 183–203.
88. Freeman R.E. The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions // Business Ethics Quarterly. 1994. № 4. P. 409–421.
89. Fung A. Varieties of participation in complex governance // Public Administration Review. 2006. № 66. P. 66–75.
90. Galston W. Liberal purposes: Goods, virtues, and duties in the liberal state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
91. Galtung J., Ruge M.H. The structure of foreign news: The Presentation of Congo, Cuba and Cyprus in four foreign newspapers // Journal of Peace Research. 1965. Vol. 2 (1). Р. 64–90.
92. Gamson W.A. A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion // Symbolic Interaction. 1988. № 11. P. 161–174.
93. Gamson W.A., Lasch K.E. The political culture of social welfare policy // Center for Research on Social Organization, University of Michigan. Working Paper № 242 (1981).
94. Gamson W.A., Meyer D.S. Framing political opportunity // Comparative perspectives on social movements / eds. D. McAdam, J.D. McCarthy, M.N. Zald. N.Y: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Р. 275–290.
95. Gandy O.H. Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood: Ablex, 1982.
96. Gitlin T. The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.
97. Green M.C., Brock T.C. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000. Vol. 79 (5). Р 701–721.
98. Green M.C., Strange J.J., Brock T.C. (eds.). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002.
99. Grunig J.E. Public relations and strategic management: Institutionalizing organization-public relationships in contemporary society // Central European Journal of Communication. 2011. № 1. P. 11–31.
100. Grunig J.E., Hunt T. Managing public relations. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1984.
101. Gubrium J.F., Hostein J.A. Narrative ethnography // Handbook of emergent methods / eds. S.N. Hesseiber, P. Leavy. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 2008. P. 241–264.
102. Gutmann A., Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.
103. Haas P.M. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination // International Organization. 1992. Vol. 46 (1). P. 1—35.
104. Hajer M.A. Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The Case of acid rain in Britain // The Argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning / eds. F. Fischer, J. Forester. Durham: Duke University Press, 1993. P. 43–76.
105. Held D. Models of democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
106. Herman E.S., Chomsky N. Manufacturing consent: The Political economy of the mass media. N.Y.: Pantheon Books, 1988.
107. Hilgartner S., Bosk C. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model // American journal of sociology. 1988. Vol. 94 (1). P. 53–78.
108. Hjarvard S. The mediatization of society. A Theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change // Nordicom Review. 2008. Vol. 29 (2). P. 105–134.
109. Hunold C. Corporatism, pluralism, and democracy: Toward a deliberative theory of bureaucratic accountability // Governance. 2001. Vol. 14 (2). P. 151–167.
110. Ibarra P.R., Kitsuse J.I. Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An Interactionist proposal for the study of social problems // Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory (Social Problems and Social Issues) / eds. D.R. Loseke, J. Best. Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter, 1993. P. 21–54.
111. Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
112. Jacobs R.N. Producing the news, producing the crisis: Narrativity, television and news work // Media Culture and Society. 1996. № 18. P. 373–397.
113. Janis I. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
114. Jenkins H. The revenge of the origami unicorn: Seven principles of transmedia storytelling. December 12, 2009. URL: http://henryjenkins.org/2009/12/the_revenge_of_the_origami_uni.html
115. Jones M.D., McBeth M.K. A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? // The Policy Studies Journal. 2010. Vol. 38 (2). P. 329–353.
116. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An Analysis of decision under risk // Econometrica. 1979. № 47. Р. 263–291.
117. Kaplan R.L. The news about new institutionalism: Journalism’s ethic of objectivity and its political origins // Political Communication. 2006. Vol. 23. P. 173–185.
118. Kelly G. The psychology of personal constructs. N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 1955/1991.
119. Kent M.L., Taylor M. Toward a dialogic theory of public relations // Public Relations Review. 2002. № 28. P. 21–37.
120. Kepplinger H.M. Reciprocal effects: Toward a theory of mass media effects on decision makers // The Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics. 2007. Vol. 12 (2). Р 3—23.
121. Kim S-H., Scheufele D.A., Shanahan J. Agenda-setting, priming, framing and second-levels in local politics // Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2002. Vol. 79 (1). Р 7—25.
122. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. N.Y.: Harper Collins Publishers, 1984/1995.
123. Korzybski A. Science and sanity. Lakeville: International non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company, 1933.
124. Kosicki G.M. The media priming effect: News media and considerations affecting political judgments // The Persuasion Handbook. London: Sage Publications, 2002.
125. Kuklinski J.H., Quirk P.J. Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion // Elements of political reason / eds. A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, S. Popkin. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 153–182.
126. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1980.
127. Lee N.J., McLeod D.M., Shah D.V. Framing policy debates: Issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues // Communication Research. 2008. Vol. 35 (5). Р 695–718.
128. Leitch S., Neilson D. Reframing public relations: New directions for theory and practice // Australian Journal of Communication. 1997. Vol. 24 (2). P. 17–32.
129. L’Etang J. Radical PR – catalyst for change or an aporia? // Ethical Space: The International Journal of Communication Ethics. 2009. Vol. 6. (2). P. 13–17.
130. Lewin K. Channels of group life // Human Relations. 1947. № 1. Р. 143–153.
131. Loewenstein G.The psychology ofcuriosity: A Review and reinterpretation // Psychological Bulletin. 1994. Vol. 116 (1). P. 75–98.
132. Maltese J.A. Spin control: The White House Office of Communications and the management of presidential news. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1994.
133. Mansbridge J.J. A deliberative theory of interest representation // The politics of interests: Interest groups transformed / ed. M.P. Petracca. Boulder: Westview Press, 1992. P. 32–57.
134. March J.G., Olsen J.P. Rediscovering institutions: The Organisational basis of politics. N.Y.: Free Press, 1989.
135. Marder M. This is watchdog journalism // Nieman Reports. 1998. Vol. 53 (2).
136. Marx G. External efforts to damage or facilitate social movements: Some patterns, explanations, outcomes, and complications // The Dynamics of Social Movements / eds. M. Zald, J.
137. McCarthy. Cambridge: Winthrop, 1979. P. 94—125.
138. McCombs M.E. Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest. N.Y.: Praeger, 1981.
139. McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. The agenda setting function of mass media // Public Opinion Quarterly. 1972. № 36. 176–185.
140. McQueen D., Jackson D., Moloney K. The «prisation» of news and media literacy. An audience reception study // Future of Journalism Conference, 8–9 September 2011, Cardiff University. 2011.
141. Messaris P., Abraham L. The role of images in framing news stories // Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world / eds. S.D. Reese, O.H. Gandy, A.E. Grant. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. P. 215–226.
142. Meyer J.W., Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony // American Journal of Sociology. 1977. Vol. 83 (2). P. 340–363.
143. Meyer D.E., Schvaneveldt R.W. Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of dependence between retrieval operations // Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971. № 90. Р. 227–234.
144. Miller N.R. Logrolling // The Encyclopedia of Democratic Thought / eds. P.B. Clarke, J. Fowerake. London: Routledge, 1999.
145. Moloney K. Rethinking public relations: PR propaganda and democracy. London: Routledge, 2006.
146. Molotch H.L, Protess D.L, Gordon M.T. The media-policy connection: Ecologies of the news // Political Communication Research / ed. D. Paletz. Norwood: Ablex, 1987. Р. 26–48.
147. Moscovici S., Zavalloni M. The group as a polarizer of attitudes // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1969. Vol. 12 (2). P. 125–135.
148. Motion J., Leitch S. A toolbox for public relations: The oeuvre of Michel Foucault // Public Relations Review. 2007. Vol. 33 (3). P. 263–268.
149. Mulligan K. Truth in fiction: The Consequences of fictional framing for political opinions // Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. June 19, 2012.
150. Nagel E. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.
151. Nooteboom B. Towards a dynamic theory of transactions // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 1992. Vol. 2 (4). P. 281–299.
152. Olson L.C., Finnegan C.A., Hope D.S. Visual rhetoric in communication. Continuing questions and contemporary issues // Visual rhetoric. А reader in communication and American culture / eds. L.C. Olson, C.A. Finnegan, D.S. Hope. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2008.
153. Orren G.R. Thinking about the press and government // Impact. How the press affects federal policymaking / ed. M. Linsky. N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 1986. Р 1—20.
154. Page B.I., Shapiro R.Y., Dempsey G. What moves public opinion? // American Political Science Review. 1987. Vol. 81 (1). Р. 23–43.
155. Paley J. Narrative machinery // Narrative and stories in health care: Illness, dying and bereavement / eds. Y. Gunaratnam, D. Oliviere. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. P. 17–32.
156. Pan Z.D., Kosicki G.M. Framing analysis: An Approach to news discourse // Political Communication. 1993. № 10. P. 55–75.
157. Petrocik J.R. Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study // American Journal of Political Science. 1996. № 40. Р 825–850.
158. Pettit P. Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma // Philosophical Issues. 2001. № 11. P. 268–299.
159. Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: William C. Brown, 1981.
160. Pfetsch B. Government news management // The politics of news, the news of politics / eds. D. Graber, D. McQuail, P. Norris. Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press, 1998. P. 70–93.
161. Pitkin H. The concept of representation. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.
162. Polkinghorne D. Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988.
163. Popkin S.L. The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago, 1994.
164. Potter J., Wetherell M. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage Publications, 1987.
165. Reese S.D. Setting the media’s agenda: A Power balance perspective // Communication Yearbook 14 / ed. J. Anderson. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1991. P. 309–340.
166. Roberts N.C., King PJ. Policy entrepreneurs: Their activity structure and function in the policy process // Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 1991. Vol. 2. P. 147–175.
167. Roskos-Ewoldsen D.R., Roskos-Ewoldsen B., Dilman Carpentier F. Media priming: An Updated synthesis // Media effects: Advances in theory and research / eds. J. Bryant, M.B. Oliver. N.Y.: Routledge, 2009. P. 74–93.
168. Ryan M.-L. Cheap plot tricks, plot holes, and narrative design // Narrative. 2009. Vol. 17 (1). P. 56–75.
169. Ryan M.-L. Embedded narratives and tellability // Style. 1986. Vol. 20 (3). P. 319–340.
170. Sabatier P.A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein // Policy Science. 1988. Vol. 21. P. 129–168.
171. Scheufele D.A. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication // Mass Communication and Society. 2000. № 3. Р. 297–316.
172. Schmidt V.A. Discursive institutionalism: The Explanatory power of ideas and discourse // Annual Review of Political Science. 2008. Vol. 11 (1). P. 303–326.
173. Schudson M. The good citizen: A History of American public life. N.Y.: Free Press, 1998.
174. Scott M.B., Lyman S.M. Accounts // American Sociological Review. 1968. Vol. 33 (1). P. 46–62.
175. Simon H.A. Administrative behavior: A Study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. N.Y.: Macmillan, 1947/1976.
176. Simon H.A. Human nature in politics: The Dialogue of psychology with political science // The American Political Science Review. 1985. Vol. 79 (2). P. 293–304.
177. Snow D.A., Benford R.D. Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization // Structure to action / eds. K. Klandermans, N. Tarrow. Greenwich: JAI, 1988. P. 197–219.
178. Somin I. Deliberative democracy and political ignorance // Critical Review. 2010. Vol. 22 (2–3). P. 253–279.
179. Spector M., Kitsuse J.I. Constructing social problems. N.Y.: Aldine de Gruyter,1987.
180. Steenbergen M.R., Bachtiger A., Sporndli M., Steiner J. Measuring political deliberation: A Discourse Quality Index // Comparative European Politics. 2003. № 1. P. 21–48.
181. Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence // Journal of Communication. 1992. Vol. 42 (4). P. 73–93.
182. Stockwell S.E. Spin doctors, citizens and democracy // Government Communication in Australia / ed. S. Young. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 2007. P. 130–143.
183. Stoker K.L., Tusinski K.A. Reconsidering public relations’ infatuation with dialogue: Why engagement and reconciliation can be more ethical than symmetry and reciprocity // Journal of Mass Media Ethics (e-Publications@Marquette). 2006. Vol. 21 (2–3).
184. Stone D.A. Policy paradox and political reason: The Art of political decision making. N.Y: W.W. Norton and Company, 1988/2002.
185. Strange J.J. How fictional tales wag real-world beliefs // Narrative impact. Social and cognitive foundations / eds. M.C. Green, J.J. Strange, T.C. Brock. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. P. 263–286.
186. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches // Academy of Management Review. 1995. Vol. 20 (3). P. 571–610.
187. Sumpter T., Tankard J.W. The spin doctor: An Alternative model of public relations // Public Relations Review. 1994. Vol. 20 (1). P. 19–27.
188. Hart M. Het woeden der gehele wereld. Amsterdam: Arbeiderspers, 1993.
189. Taber C.S., Lodge M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs // American Journal of Political Science. 2006. № 50. P. 755–769.
190. Tewksbury D., Jones J., Peske M.W., Raymond A., Vig W. The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue // Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000. № 77. Р 804–829.
191. Thelen K., Steinmo S. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics // Historical institutionalism in comparative politics: State, society, and economy / eds. S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, F. Longstreth. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1992. P. 1—32.
192. Thornton P.H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics // The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism / eds. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, R. Suddaby. London: Sage Publications, 2008. P. 371–388.
193. Tuchman G. Making news: A Study in the construction of reality. N.Y.: Free Press, 1978.
194. Tuchman G. The symbolic annihilation of women by the mass media // The manufacture of news: Deviance, social problems and the mass media / eds. S. Cohen, J. Young. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1981. Р 169–185.
195. Leeuwen T. van, Wodak R. Legitimizing immigration control: A Discourse-historical perspective // Discourse Studies. 1999. Vol. 1 (1). P. 83—118.
196. van Ruler B., Vercic D. Reflective communication management // Paper presented at the 53rd Annual Conference of the International Communication Association «Communication in Borderlands». May, 23–27, 2003. San Diego, CA, USA.
197. Walton D. Deceptive arguments containing persuasive language and definitions // Argumentation. 2005. Vol. 19. P. 159–186.
198. Weick K.E. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1995.
199. Wessler H. Investigating deliberativeness comparatively // Political Communication. 2008. Vol. 25 (1). P. 1—22.
200. Wolfsfeld G. Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
201. Wolfsfeld G. Political waves and democratic discourse: Terrorism waves during the Oslo peace process // Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy / eds. W.L. Bennett, R.M. Entman. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2001. P. 226–251.
202. Young I.M. Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy // Democracy and difference – Contesting the boundaries of the political / ed. S. Benhabib. Princeton University Press, 1996.
203. Zaller J.R. A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen // Political Communication. 2003. № 20. P. 109–130.
- Введение
- Глава 1 Определение проблемы и установка повестки дня
- Глава 2 Когнитивные схемы и социокультурные сценарии
- Глава 3 Центральные и периферийные когнитивные стратегии
- Глава 4 Технологии оправдания и обвинения
- Глава 5 Сущность, типология и приемы фрейминга
- Глава 6 Медиалогика и фрейминг новостей
- Глава 7 «Объективность» и «беспристрастность» журналистики
- Глава 8 Сопряжение и рекреатизация в публичной сфере
- Глава 9 Политический сторителлинг и символические акции
- Глава 10 Делиберация и делиберативная демократия
- Глава 11 Диалоговый пиар и стратегические коммуникации
- Глава 12 Политический пиар и пиар-кампании
- Заключение
- Приемы софистики и спин-контроля
- Список рекомендуемой литературы
- Список использованной литературы
- Содержание книги
- Популярные страницы