Книга: Mastering VMware® Infrastructure3

Calculating the Return on Investment

Calculating the Return on Investment

In today's world, every company is anxious and hoping for the opportunity for growth. Expansion is often a sign that a company is fiscally successful and in a position to take on the new challenges that come with an increasing product line or customer base. For the IT managers, expansion means planning and budgeting for human capital, computing power, and spatial constraints.

As many organizations are figuring out, virtualization is a means of reducing the costs and overall headaches involved with either consistent or rapid growth. Virtualization offers solutions that help IT managers address the human, computer, and spatial challenges that accompany corporate demands.

Let's look at a common scenario facing many successful medium-to-large business environments. Take the fictitious company Learn2Virtualize (L2V) Inc. L2V currently has 40 physical servers and an EMC fibre channel storage device in a datacenter in St. Petersburg, Florida. During the coming fiscal year, through acquisitions, new products, and new markets L2V expects to grow to more than 100 servers. If L2V continues to grow using the traditional information systems model, they will buy close to 100 physical servers during their rapid expansion. This will allow them to continue minimizing services on hosts in an effort to harden the operating systems. This practice is not uncommon for many IT shops. As a proven security technique, it is best to minimize the number of services provided by a given server to reduce the exposure to vulnerability across different services. Using physical server deployment will force L2V to look at their existing and future power and datacenter space consumption. In addition, they will need to consider the additional personnel that might be required. With physical server implementations, L2V might be looking at expenses of more than $150,000 in hardware costs alone. And while that might be on the low side, consider that power costs will rise and that server CPU utilization, if it is consistent with industry norms, might sit somewhere between 5 and 10 percent. The return on investment just doesn't seem worth it.

Now let's consider the path to virtualization. Let's look at several options L2V might have if they move in the direction of server consolidation using the VI3 platform. Since L2V already owns a storage device, we'll refrain from including that as part of the return on investment (ROI) calculation for their virtual infrastructure. L2V is interested in the enterprise features of VMotion, DRS, and HA, and therefore they are included in each of the ROI calculations.

Each of the following three ROI calculations identifies various levels of availability, including single server failure, two-server failure, or no consideration for failover. All of the required software licenses have been included as part of the calculation; however, annual licensing fees have not been included since there are several options and they are recurring annual charges. 

Scenario 1: Quad Core 3 Server Cluster 

Scenario 2: Quad Core Four Server Cluster

Although both scenarios present a different deployment, the consistent theme is that using VI3 reduces the cost per server by introducing them as virtual machines. At the lowest cost, virtual machines would each cost $898, and even at the highest cost, they would run $2,394 per machine. These cost savings do not include the intrinsic savings on power consumption, space requirements, and additional employees required to manage the infrastructure.

Though your environment may certainly differ from the L2V Inc. example, the concepts and processes of identifying the ROI will be similar. Use these examples to identify the sweet spot for your company based on your existing and future goals.

No matter the vendor or model selected, ESX Server 3.5 has a set of CPU and memory maximums, as shown in Table 2.1. 

Table 2.1: ESX Server 3.5 Maximums 

Оглавление книги